OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 12 shown for “Case (Inrō) with Design of Flowering Hagi, Chrysanthemums and Autumn Grasses” — 24 records examined, 0 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-08-27 19:27 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.Smithsonian Open Access: HTTP 429 from api.si.edu. Results from the remaining archive are shown unchanged — nothing is substituted for a source that did not answer.
Case (Inrō) with Design of Flowering Hagi, Chrysanthemums and Autumn Grasses
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Case (Inrō) with Design of Flowering Hagi, Chrysanthemum and Autumn Grasses
Artist not stated in the record · 18th–19th century
Sake Ewer (Hisage) with Chrysanthemums and Paulownia Crests in Alternating Fields
Artist not stated in the record · early 17th century
Stand with Autumn Grasses and Flowers
Artist not stated in the record · first half of the 17th century
Inrō with Tanabata Story of the Weaver and the Herdboy
Nomura Kyūkoku · active first half of the19th century
Case (Inrō) with Design of Grapevine
Artist not stated in the record · 18th–19th century
Inrō with Basket of Spring Flowers (obverse); Basket of Autumn Flowers (reverse)
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th–early 19th century
Case (Inrō) with Design of Cicada on Tree Trunk
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Inrō with Autumn Ivy
Koma Kyūhaku VI · early 19th century
Inrō with Rabbit in the Moon and Autumn Grasses
Kyūkoku · first half of the 19th century
Case (Inrō) with Design of Insects beside Flowering Autumn Grasses
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Case (Inrō) with Design of Leafy Grapevines (obverse); Chrysanthemum Spray (reverse)
Artist not stated in the record · 18th–19th century
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 65 matched · 24 examined · 0 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. HTTP 429 from api.si.edu. No records from this archive are shown for this query.Unavailable
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-08-27 19:27 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.