OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Chasuble Fragment” — 64 records examined, 2 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-08-27 04:24 UTC · served from cache, not re-queried for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Chasuble fragment
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1400
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 16th–17th century
Chasuble Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 14th century
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1550 (velvets), ca. 1500 (embroidery), cut, combined, patched and reshaped ca. 1890
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 15th–17th century
Chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1720 (figurative woven silk), ca. 1775 (embroidered orphrey), cut patched and reassembled ca. 1775
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · mid-18th century
Fragment of a chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Fragment of Chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · 15th century
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 16th century
Fragment of a Chasuble (front)
Artist not stated in the record · mid-15th century
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 1705–15
Fragment of a Chasuble (back)
Artist not stated in the record · mid-15th century
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Fragment of a Chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · mid-15th century
Chasuble fragments
Artist not stated in the record · early 18th century
Fragment of a Chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · mid-15th century
Fragments from a chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th century
Chasuble front
Artist not stated in the record · Early 16th century
Fragments of a chasuble
Artist not stated in the record · 16th–17th century
Chasuble Back
Artist not stated in the record · mid-15th century
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 43 matched · 24 examined · 0 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 39082 matched · 40 examined · 2 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-08-27 04:24 UTC, replayed here rather than repeated. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.