OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Design for a Bracelet” — 64 records examined, 13 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-09-03 05:39 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term..jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Design for a bracelet (in two pieces)
Louis-Oscar Roty · 19th century
Design for a Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · early 19th century
Quilt, Album pattern
Brown and Turner families · begun 1846
Designs for a Bracelet and Brooch
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1875
Bracelet
Castellani · ca. 1860
Design for a Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1785
Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · 1200–800 BCE
Design for a bracelet
Salvatori, Italian, active 19th century · 1875
Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · 1200–800 BCE
Design for a Bracelet
George E Germer, 1868 – 1936 · 1910–1915
Side table (one of a pair)
Matthias Lock · ca. 1740
Design for a Bracelet
George E Germer, 1868 – 1936 · 1910–1920
Tapestry Room from Croome Court
Robert Adam · 1763–71
Design for a Bracelet
George E Germer, 1868 – 1936 · 1910–1920
Seasons and Elements (Summer) (set of four)
Charles Le Brun · ca. 1683
Designs for a Bracelet
Salvatori, Italian, active 19th century · 1875–1900
Seasons and Elements (Fire) (set of four)
Charles Le Brun · ca. 1683
Designs for a Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · 1800–1825
Seasons and Elements (Spring) (set of four)
Charles Le Brun · ca. 1683
Design for a Bracelet
Artist not stated in the record · 1820–30
Chimneypiece (cheminée)
François Joseph Belanger · 1784
Design for a Bracelet with Alternate Suggestions
Artist not stated in the record · 1825–50
Dining room from Lansdowne House
Robert Adam · 1766–69
Design for a Bracelet
Salvatori, Italian, active 19th century · 1875–1900
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 22531 matched · 24 examined · 4 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 2093762 matched · 40 examined · 9 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-09-03 05:39 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.