OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Fragment of a Carpet with Quatrefoil Design” — 64 records examined, 1 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-08-28 22:43 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Fragment of a Carpet with Quatrefoil Design
Artist not stated in the record · 16th–17th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · 16th century
Carpet fragment
Artist not stated in the record · mid-19th century
Carpet
Thomas Whitty · ca. 1765
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 16th century
Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · probably late 18th–early 19th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 16th–17th century
Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · late 16th–early 17th century
Carpet fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1850–1900
The Emperor's Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · second half 16th century
Fragment of maniple or stole
Artist not stated in the record · 16th–17th century
Five Medallion Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1500
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
'Lotto' Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · 16th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 10th–12th century
Fragments of a marble statue of the Diadoumenos (youth tying a fillet around his head)
Polykleitos · ca. 69–96 CE
Carpet fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1680–90
Carpet with Palm Trees, Ibexes, and Birds
Artist not stated in the record · late 16th–early 17th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
"Lotto" Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1600
Carpet fragment
Bigelow Carpet Company, American · 1849–1900
Silk Animal Carpet
Artist not stated in the record · second half 16th century
Carpet fragment
Artist not stated in the record · mid-19th century
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 1383 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 3892801 matched · 40 examined · 0 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-08-28 22:43 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.