OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Fragment of a striped inlay” — 64 records examined, 11 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-09-07 19:10 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Inlay with stripes
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 200 BCE–CE 100
Fragment of a striped inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Couch and footstool with bone carvings and glass inlays
Artist not stated in the record · 1st–2nd century CE
Fragment of striped inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305-30 BCE
Inlay fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 100 BCE–100 CE
Fragment of striped inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Glass striped mosaic fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment of striped inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Glass striped mosaic fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment of striped inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Glass striped mosaic fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment of striped inlay. Plate mosaic
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Glass monochrome inlay fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1st half of 1st century CE
Wooden Inlay Fragment Created By Peter Glass
Glass, Peter · Late 19th C.
Glass monochrome inlay fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1st half of 1st century CE
Fragment of an inlay
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE - 14 CE
Glass striped mosaic carinated bowl fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1840s
Glass striped mosaic bowl
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Inlay fragment, rosette
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 200 BCE–CE 100
Fragment of an inlay with a floral design
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Glass mosaic inlay fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE
Fragment of an inlay plate, with a floral design
Artist not stated in the record · 305 BCE-14 CE
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 401 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 3863234 matched · 40 examined · 10 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-09-07 19:10 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.