OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Robe fragment” — 64 records examined, 16 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-08-28 00:40 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Robe fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Noh robe fragment (karaori) 唐織
Artist not stated in the record · mid 18th century
Fragment of a Robe (Jama)
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1628–58
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Kaftan
Artist not stated in the record · second half 17th–early 18th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 14th century
Fragment of a Kaftan Back
Artist not stated in the record · mid-16th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Textile Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1540
Sidewall - fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1785–95
Textile Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 16th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Tiraz Textile Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 9th–early 10th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Cartonnage fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 100–300 CE
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1805
Festival Robe
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Costume fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Fragmentary Loom Width with Wavy-Vine Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1565–80
Textile
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
The Assumption of the Virgin
Bernardo Daddi · 1337–38
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1820
Fragments of Robe-Front
Artist not stated in the record · first half 17th century
Decorative panel
Artist not stated in the record · 1845–1850
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 104 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 41101 matched · 40 examined · 15 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-08-28 00:40 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.