Two archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Tea bowl with notched foot, Hagi ware” — 64 records examined, 1 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-09-03 06:37 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Shino Tea Bowl with Bridge and Shrine, Known as “Bridge of the Gods” (Shinkyō)
Artist not stated in the record · late 16th–early 17th century

Tea bowl with notched foot, Hagi ware
Artist not stated in the record · late 17th century

Teabowl
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century

Tea bowl with indented rim, Hagi ware
Artist not stated in the record · mid 17th century

Altar bowl with Tibetan inscription
Artist not stated in the record · early 15th century

Hagi ware tea bowl
Artist not stated in the record · 18th-mid 19th century

Clog-shaped tea bowl (kutsu-gata chawan) with plum blossoms and geometric patterns
Artist not stated in the record · early 17th century

Tea bowl in the shape of an Ido tea bowl, Hagi ware
Artist not stated in the record · mid 18th-mid 19th century

Bowl with Buddhist Assembly
Artist not stated in the record

Tea bowl, possibly Hagi ware
Artist not stated in the record · 18th-19th century

Black Seto (Seto-guro) Tea Bowl, named Iron Mallet (Tettsui)
Artist not stated in the record · late 16th century

Hagi ware tea bowl, copy of Ido type
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century

Black Raku Tea Bowl, Named “Kaedegure” (Twilight by the Maples)
Raku Chōjirō · 17th century

Tea bowl in hori-mishima style, possibly Hagi or Seto ware
Artist not stated in the record · late 17th-18th century

Bowl with Radish and Vegetables
Artist not stated in the record · second half 17th century

Tea bowl in the shape of a "Chinese flute," Hagi ware
Artist not stated in the record · mid 19th century

Set of Five Teacups (Yunomi-wan) with Chrysanthemum and Broken-Ice Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th–early 19th century

Hagi ware tea bowl in the shape of a Korean tea bowl
Artist not stated in the record · 18th-19th century

Set of Five Teacups (Yunomi-wan) with Chrysanthemum and Broken-Ice Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th–early 19th century

Tea bowl in Korean style, Karatsu ware
Artist not stated in the record · 1600-1620

Set of Five Teacups (Yunomi-wan) with Chrysanthemum and Broken-Ice Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th–early 19th century

Tea bowl, possibly Agano ware
Artist not stated in the record · 1620-1650

Set of Five Teacups (Yunomi-wan) with Chrysanthemum and Broken-Ice Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th–early 19th century

Shodai ware tea bowl in Irabo style
Artist not stated in the record · 1750-1850
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 33 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 414326 matched · 40 examined · 0 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-09-03 06:37 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.