OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 20 shown for “Terracotta trozella (two-handled jar)” — 64 records examined, 32 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-08-28 01:22 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Terracotta trozella (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · late 5th–early 4th century BCE
Jar and lid
Artist not stated in the record · possibly 19th century
Terracotta trozella (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · 5th century BCE
Jar and cover
Artist not stated in the record · possibly 19th century
Terracotta trozella (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · 4th century BCE
Earthenware Jar
Robert Frederick Blum, American, 1857–1903 · 1877
Terracotta nestoris (two-handled jar)
Painter of New York 52.11.2 · ca. 360–350 BCE
Earthenware Jar
Robert Frederick Blum, American, 1857–1903 · 1877
Terracotta amphora (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · ca. late 1st century CE
Jar with Two Handles
Unidentified · 100-200
Terracotta amphora (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 100–225 CE
jar
Artist not stated in the record · 18th Century
Terracotta amphora (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 100–225 CE
Jar
William Frend De Morgan, British, 1839–1917 · ca. 1888–97
Terracotta amphora (two-handled jar)
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 100–225 CE
Jar with Two Handles
Unidentified · 200-300
Terracotta two-handled vase
Artist not stated in the record · late 4th–early 3rd century BCE
Terracotta nestoris (two-handled jar)
Primato Painter · ca. 350–325 BCE
Terracotta fragment of a nestoris (two-handled jar)?
Pisticci Painter · 440–420 BCE
Terracotta two-handled jar
Artist not stated in the record · early 7th–mid 7th century BC
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 73 matched · 24 examined · 0 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 511 matched · 40 examined · 32 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.8 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-08-28 01:22 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.