OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Textile fragment with repeating pattern of cranes and chrysanthemums” — 64 records examined, 2 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-09-03 06:50 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Textile fragment with repeating pattern of cranes and chrysanthemums
Artist not stated in the record · 18th–19th century
Textile
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Shirt
Moche artist(s) · 500–850 CE
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Fragmentary Loom Width with Wavy-Vine Pattern
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1565–80
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Wine Ewer with Chrysanthemums and Lotus Flowers
Artist not stated in the record · first half of the 13th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Table clock with calendar
Lucien Falize · 1881
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Fragmentary Silk Velvet with Repeating Tiger-stripe and 'Chintamani' Design
Artist not stated in the record · second half 15th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Textile Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 14th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Crib of the Infant Jesus
Artist not stated in the record · 15th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 17th century
Tunic with Felines
Artist not stated in the record · 1450–1550
Fragments
Artist not stated in the record · 18th–19th century
Bowl decorated with phoenixes, clouds, and chrysanthemums
Artist not stated in the record · early 14th century
Panel
Bruce James Talbert, Scottish, 1838–1881 · ca. 1870
Bowl decorated with cranes, rain, and chrysanthemums
Artist not stated in the record · early 14th century
Fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 1750–1800
The Assumption of the Virgin
Bernardo Daddi · 1337–38
Textile fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 19th century
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 936 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 3140788 matched · 40 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-09-03 06:50 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.