OpenTwo archives, queried live.
Every record below comes from The Met or Smithsonian Open Access and was filtered on that archive’s own rights field before it reached this page. 24 shown for “Trial Proof for a Flower Chintz” — 64 records examined, 3 dropped by the rights gate.
Archives queried 2026-09-08 05:40 UTC · fetched live for this request
isPublicDomain field is true for this object.metadata_usage.access reads CC0 — a waiver, not an expired term.
Palampore
Artist not stated in the record · first quarter of the 18th century
Trial Proof for a Flowered Chintz
Artist not stated in the record · 1820–30
Chintz appliquéd quilt
Mary Malvina Cook Taft · ca. 1835–40
Trial Proof for a Flower Chintz
Artist not stated in the record · 1790–1800
Floral Chintz Quilt
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1775, patched, quilted and reassembled in current form ca. 1875
Trial Proof for a Flower Chintz
Artist not stated in the record · 1820–30
Portrait Bust of Mademoiselle Marcelle Lender
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec · 1895
Woodblock Trial Proof for a Printed Textile
Artist not stated in the record · 1790–1800
Textile Panel of Chintz
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Chintz border
Artist not stated in the record · ca. 1800
A Vase of Flowers
Margareta Haverman · 1716
Trial-proof for a printed vertical border
Artist not stated in the record · 1780–1800
Tomb of Porsenna
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1844
Chintz fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
The Mouth of a Brook, No. 1
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1859
Chintz fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
The Lovers' Walk, No. 1
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1864
Chintz fragment
Artist not stated in the record · late 18th century
Scotch Firs, Inveroran
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1873
Chintz
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Penton Hook
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1864
Chintz fragment
Artist not stated in the record · 18th century
Yacht Tavern, Erith
Sir Francis Seymour Haden · 1865
Chintz fragments
Artist not stated in the record · mid-18th century
Where these records came from.
Two archives are wired, and only two. Each one is filtered on its own rights field — never on a title match, and never on the presence of an image file.
- The Met Collection API (Open Access)Rights field:
isPublicDomain. 95 matched · 24 examined · 1 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where isPublicDomain === true and a file URL was published.12 shown - Smithsonian Open Access API (api.si.edu)Rights field:
content.descriptiveNonRepeating.metadata_usage.access. 2119474 matched · 40 examined · 2 dropped by the rights gate. Kept only where metadata_usage.access === "CC0" and an image resource was published.12 shown
These figures describe the pass run at 2026-09-08 05:40 UTC, during this request. A completed pass is kept for 24 hours and replayed for an identical search, which is what keeps repeated queries inside Smithsonian’s 30-requests-per-hour allowance. A pass in which either archive failed to answer is never kept — an outage must not be replayed as though it were a finding about the catalogue.
Wikimedia Commons and the Library of Congress are deliberately not wired. Wikimedia was confirmed, on a live query, to return CC-BY material inside the same result set as genuine public domain works, and filtering it safely has not been designed yet. loc.gov was blocked by bot detection during the source evaluation, so its rights vocabulary has never been observed — and nothing here is built on a field nobody has read.
An image file is a rights claim. It never travels without its field.